Products - Reunited Products - Compressors Products - Induction system Products - Radiography Products - Sterilization Dental products - Strumentistica Download Catalogs Request Technical Used Gear Sale Search Dental Studio Enter your dentist Dental Glossary Associations


Infoline Skype

Online Help 24h/24h for Skype users. Click on the icon

You can call me via Skype, click here
Dentaltecno Up

medici

Physicians registered from 1980 to 1984 are entitled to a new aptitude test for registration as a dentist.

The Ministry of Health should therefore hold a new examination because the rule that will include enrollment for qualified graduates had set no deadlines for submitting an application. The Tar Lazio (decision No. 8857/09, filed on October 15) has thus allowed the application of a new doctor on "silent rejection kept the administration on the instance to establish the aptitude test for registration as a dentist of Reggio Calabria.

31 July 2008, the Order reggino make known to the doctor, writing in 1988 under Law 409/85, the deletion from the register of dentists. In September, the doctor spawns a-time warning to call for a new aptitude test for entry in, but his request fell on deaf ears. The doctor turns to the Tar, holding the intimate silence government (ministries of health and education, the order of Reggio Calabria) subtracting a double outline of complaint: breach of Articles 3 and 97 of the Constitution and the Decree No. 386/1996 and excess misuse of power.

The college has now been proved right to the doctor and ordered to 2,000 euros in costs to the health ministry (of which 500 to the applicant). The issue was already addressed by the third section with a decision confirmed by the State Council (No. 2556/2008): Decree 386 did not mention a deadline for enrollment on the opportunities for vehicles registered in the years mentioned above.

Furthermore, with the entry into force of the EC Directive n. 2005/36 confirms the requirement for the ministry to provide a new aptitude test, given that the exclusion of those who could not attend the first trial or has not exceeded inconsistent with the constitutional principles of equality treatment and freedom of choice of work.

Source: Il Sole 24 Ore Health